A VAPT methodology built around your security objectives. NuageSEC follows an 8-phase VAPT methodology — Discovery, Reconnaissance, Threat Modeling, Scanning, Manual Exploitation, Risk Analysis, Reporting and Re-Testing — that turns scanner output into actionable, validated risk.
Ready to scope a VAPT engagement? Talk to our VAPT team.
A VAPT assessment should not end with a list of scanner findings. It should help answer: what was tested? What was actually exploitable? Which findings matter most? What should the team fix first? Were the fixes effective?
NuageSEC follows an 8-phase VAPT methodology covering Discovery, Reconnaissance, Threat Modeling, Scanning, Manual Exploitation, Risk Analysis, Reporting and Re-Testing.
Security teams rarely struggle only with finding vulnerabilities. The harder questions are often: "Did we test the right assets?", "Could testing affect production?", "Is this scanner finding actually exploitable?", "Which vulnerability should engineering fix first?", "What does this issue mean to the business?", "How do we verify the fix?"
The methodology connects those questions into one assessment lifecycle: Scope → Understand → Identify → Validate → Prioritize → Report → Remediate → Re-Test.
This planning-oriented approach is consistent with NIST SP 800-115, which addresses planning and conducting technical security tests, analyzing findings and developing mitigation strategies.
| Phase | What Happens | Customer Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| 01. Discovery | Define objectives, targets and engagement boundaries | Clear assessment scope |
| 02. Reconnaissance | Map assets, services and attack surface | Better visibility of the target |
| 03. Threat Modeling | Analyze entry points, trust boundaries and privileges | Prioritized testing scenarios |
| 04. Scanning | Identify candidate vulnerabilities and weaknesses | Broad technical coverage |
| 05. Manual Exploitation | Validate weaknesses through controlled testing | Stronger evidence of exploitability |
| 06. Risk Analysis | Assess severity, business context and likelihood | Actionable remediation priorities |
| 07. Reporting | Document findings, evidence, impact and remediation | Clear technical and management output |
| 08. Re-Testing | Verify implemented fixes | Confirmation of remediation |
These are the eight phases currently published by NuageSEC.
Here's the problem each phase solves, and what you get at the end of it.
Unclear scope can leave important assets outside the assessment or create unnecessary operational risk. The phase establishes assessment objectives, in-scope assets, testing boundaries, rules of engagement and timelines.
A documented starting point for the assessment.
"Do we know what is actually exposed within our authorized scope?" This phase helps identify public-facing assets, services and ports, APIs, technologies/versions and relevant cloud resources.
A clearer picture of the attack surface to be assessed.
"We have many assets. Where should deeper testing focus?" The assessment considers entry points, trust boundaries, user privileges and sensitive functionality.
Testing priorities connected to the target's architecture and access model.
"How do we identify a broad range of potential weaknesses efficiently?" Scanning helps identify known vulnerabilities, missing updates, default configurations and other candidate weaknesses — though a scanner result is a candidate finding, not proof of real-world impact.
A broad set of candidate findings for deeper investigation.
"Is this vulnerability genuinely exploitable, or only a theoretical scanner result?" Manual testing investigates authentication weaknesses, authorization failures, access-control boundaries, business logic, privilege escalation and multi-step attack scenarios.
Evidence that helps distinguish meaningful security weaknesses from unvalidated technical alerts.
"We have many findings. Which ones deserve immediate attention?" Risk analysis considers technical severity, business context and likelihood of exploitation.
A clearer basis for remediation prioritization.
A VAPT report should serve more than one audience — leadership (concerns, impact, priorities), security teams (severity, evidence, attack context) and engineering teams (root cause, proof of concept, remediation, validation requirements).
A report that can support both security decisions and remediation work.
"How do we know the reported vulnerability was actually fixed?" Re-testing checks whether the original issue remains exploitable, whether the fix addresses the reported weakness, and whether the control now behaves as expected.
A documented remediation status for findings included within the re-testing scope.
For a customer, the concern is not only finding vulnerabilities. It is also: "How will testing be controlled while our systems are operating?" NuageSEC's current VAPT engagement process includes defined rules of engagement, testing windows, communication and escalation processes. Its published FAQ also states that production testing is planned to minimize operational impact.
Customer outcome: clear expectations and testing boundaries before active assessment begins.
| Aspect | Automated Scanning | Manual Security Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | Broad initial coverage | Deeper validation |
| Focus | Known vulnerabilities | Authentication and authorization analysis |
| Scope | Configuration weaknesses | Business-logic analysis |
| Speed | Faster candidate identification | Context-driven testing |
| Output | Candidate findings | Exploitability evidence |
The objective is not simply to increase the number of findings. It is to give the customer better evidence for deciding what requires attention.
The assessment lifecycle stays structured. The technical testing changes with the target.
NuageSEC's current VAPT service explicitly covers these technology areas.
See every pillar and how to choose the right starting point. Explore VAPT by Technology →
NuageSEC states that its VAPT methodology is aligned with OWASP, OSSTMM and PTES, and references additional security standards and frameworks. Alignment with a framework or testing guide does not itself mean that an assessment provides certification or guarantees regulatory compliance.
NuageSEC also publicly provides Web, Network and API penetration-testing sample reports so prospects can review examples of its reporting approach.
Review examples of NuageSEC's reporting approach. View Sample Reports →
The methodology leads to real security findings. NuageSEC's public case-study portfolio includes assessments across e-commerce, healthcare/API, AI/SaaS and external network environments — reporting 18,000+ vulnerabilities, 50+ assessments completed and 98% customer satisfaction, along with other published outcome metrics.
These examples demonstrate the breadth of environments assessed by NuageSEC. Individual case studies should not be labeled Black Box, Gray Box or White Box engagements unless that specific approach is explicitly documented in the case study.
See the full portfolio of published assessments. Explore NuageSEC Case Studies →
A VAPT methodology is the structured process used to plan, conduct, analyze, report and verify a vulnerability assessment and penetration test.
NuageSEC currently describes eight phases: Discovery, Reconnaissance, Threat Modeling, Scanning, Manual Exploitation, Risk Analysis, Reporting and Re-Testing.
No. NuageSEC's methodology includes automated scanning as well as manual exploitation and analysis.
Manual testing can investigate areas such as authentication, authorization, business logic and privilege escalation that require deeper validation than an automated scan alone.
Findings are analyzed, prioritized and reported with remediation guidance. Re-testing can then validate fixes included within scope.
Production testing can be undertaken where it is authorized and appropriately planned. NuageSEC states that production testing is planned to minimize operational impact and follows defined testing conditions.
The duration depends on the scope and complexity of the assessment. A single web application can take several business days, while broader enterprise assessments can take several weeks.
The assessment lifecycle can remain structured, but the technical testing changes according to the target technology, architecture and objective.
No security assessment can establish that a system has zero vulnerabilities. VAPT provides evidence about weaknesses identified within the agreed scope and testing conditions.
Tell us about your organization. Our VAPT team will get back within one business day to define the right scope and next steps.